Glulam, integrated veneer, wood

Analysis of risk management and evaluation methods for building fire engineering

**Introduction** The ancients once said, "There are accidents in the sky." Building fire engineering is an open system that is inevitably influenced by various uncertainties, especially in large-scale projects. These projects often involve long construction periods, complex technical conditions, and limitations in planning and design. As a result, during construction and operation, they may encounter numerous adverse factors, leading to risks that could prevent the achievement of objectives such as progress, quality, safety, and cost control, causing significant losses to the country and its people. Therefore, identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in building fire engineering, as well as how to manage and monitor them, are essential issues that must be addressed and valued. These form the core of research on risk management in fire engineering. Conducting research on risk management and fire engineering methods for building fire protection aligns with China's fire protection policy of "prevention-oriented, combining prevention with elimination." Understanding fire risk management allows us to control investment, progress, and quality through scientific methods. Fire risk management is part of the overall fire safety process and runs throughout the entire lifecycle of a building project. Applying fire risk management theory helps balance the specific requirements of different phases of construction and operation. Thus, studying fire risk management is of great significance to fire safety. **2. Construction Fire Engineering Risk** **2.1 Classification of Risks and Risk Events** The risk in building fire engineering refers to the possibility that the project goals cannot be achieved under the specified conditions. It consists of two elements: (a) the potential for an event to occur, which we call the project risk rate (RiskProbability), and (b) the consequences of negative events. **2.2 Characteristics of Building Fire Engineering Risk** (1) Objectivity: Fire engineering risks exist independently of human will. Whether it is natural disasters, wars, or social conflicts, these risks are always present. However, as our understanding of risk improves, it becomes possible to manage them more effectively. (2) Uncertainty: The occurrence, timing, and consequences of risks are uncertain. However, historical data and experience can help make predictions. (3) Variability: When risk factors change, both the likelihood and impact of risks also change. (4) Stages: Fire engineering risks go through three stages: potential, occurrence, and consequence. **3. Risk Identification in Building Fire Engineering** Fire engineering risk identification is the first and most important step in risk management. It involves determining what risks exist in the project, their potential impacts, and documenting them. **3.1 Risk Identification Process and Methods** Common methods include empirical data analysis, risk investigation, expert consultation, and experimental demonstration. Collecting data from similar projects, such as records, summaries, and accident reports, provides valuable insights. Risk investigations help build an initial risk list, which is then refined based on the project’s unique characteristics. Expert consultations and questionnaires can also provide critical input, helping to classify and analyze identified risks. **3.2 Case Study: A Large Home Shopping Mall in Wenzhou** This mall has seven floors above ground, stands 39.9 meters high, covers about 10,700 square meters, and has 3,300 square meters of underground space. Several risks were identified, including poor construction practices, substandard materials, and inadequate design. For example, some construction units reduced fire engineering investments to maximize profits, using low-quality products. Others violated fire regulations by skipping design reviews, creating inherent fire hazards. Design organizations sometimes compromised due to market pressures, resulting in unsafe designs. Additionally, the installation of fire-fighting equipment was often flawed, leading to inefficiencies in emergency response. **4. Risk Assessment of Building Fire Engineering** Risk assessment involves analyzing the probability of risk events, their potential losses, and their combined effects. It helps develop risk management plans, identify responses, and monitor risks. Risk assessment includes both risk analysis and evaluation. **4.1 Risk Assessment of Building Fire Engineering** This step evaluates the likelihood and consequences of risk events, providing a basis for analyzing overall or specific risks. **4.1.1 Risk Assessment Methods** Models are commonly used to describe risk factors and events. Countries like the U.S., Australia, and Canada have developed methods such as BFSEM, RAM, and FIRECAM, which are widely used in performance-based design. **4.1.2 Estimated Probability of Risk Events** Determining the probability distribution of risks is crucial. Objective probabilities are derived from historical data, while subjective or theoretical probabilities are used when data is limited. **4.1.3 Risk Loss Estimation** Loss estimates include investment, schedule, quality, and safety risks, with economic loss being the ultimate concern. **4.1.3.1 Maximum One-Time Loss** Estimating maximum one-time loss is vital because a sudden large loss could terminate a project due to liquidity issues, whereas gradual losses can be managed financially. **4.1.3.2 Overall Project Loss** Overall loss occurs when a single event causes long-term impacts, which is often overlooked in standard assessments. **4.2 Risk Evaluation of Building Fire Engineering** This step goes beyond risk assessment by analyzing the combined effects of multiple risks and determining whether the project can accept them. It helps prioritize risks, understand their relationships, and refine response strategies. **4.2.1 Risk Assessment Criteria** Project owners define acceptable risk levels. For instance, Yangzi Petrochemical-BASF uses standards for assessing tank leakage risks, offering a model for building fire engineering. **5. Risk Response and Management of Building Fire Engineering** After identifying, estimating, and evaluating risks, managers must develop practical response plans. Strategies include risk avoidance, transfer, mitigation, acceptance, and utilization, aiming to minimize negative impacts or turn risks into opportunities. **5.1 Risk Response Plan and Strategy** Developing a risk strategy involves choosing effective measures to achieve project goals and reduce threats. Common strategies include risk aversion, transfer, mitigation, retention, and utilization. **5.2 Ways to Avoid Risks** There are two types of risk avoidance: avoiding the risk itself or mitigating its consequences. For example, changing architectural designs to eliminate high-risk solutions or improving fire protection systems to reduce damage after an incident. **5.2.1 Risk Avoidance Planning System** A comprehensive system includes prevention, disaster, and emergency plans to address risks at different stages. **5.2.2 Limitations of Risk Avoidance** While effective, risk avoidance can limit opportunities, hinder innovation, and be constrained by incomplete information. **5.3 Risk Transfer** Risk transfer involves shifting responsibility to another party, such as owners, designers, or contractors. It can be done through contracts or insurance. **5.3.1 Non-Insurance Transfer** This involves contractual agreements to transfer risks without insurance, such as adjusting fire management measures to reduce initial costs. **5.3.2 Insurance Transfer** Insurance is a common method to transfer financial risks, allowing project stakeholders to receive compensation for losses. **5.4 Risk Retention** Risk retention, or acceptance, involves taking responsibility for residual risks that cannot be avoided or transferred. **5.5 Risk Utilization** This higher-level strategy turns risks into opportunities by leveraging them for competitive advantage. **5.6 Risk Management Decision-Making** Managers must choose the best plan based on available information, ensuring alignment with project goals. **6. Comprehensive Evaluation** Each step in risk management is critical, and priorities vary depending on the project. For mature projects, risk response is key, while for emerging ones, risk assessment is more important. Choosing the right assessment model and criteria is essential for accurate evaluations. **7. Conclusion** Building fire engineering risk management plays a crucial role in fire safety. Through proper risk identification, assessment, and response, losses can be minimized, and performance-based design can be advanced. While research in this area is still developing in China, with growing expertise and international collaboration, the field is expected to see significant growth in the near future.

WPC Cladding

Shandong Zeen Decoration Material Co., Ltd. , https://www.zeendecor.com